| Optical Transparency | 15% | For a clear screen-protector film, set a project-specific target for visible-light transmittance and require low haze. A common initial screening target is visible-light transmittance of at least 90% and haze of no more than 1%, subject to the device and film construction. | Independent optical test report using ASTM D1003 or an equivalent method; test results should identify film thickness, coating structure, and measurement conditions. | 5 PointsConsistent results meet or exceed the agreed target. 3 PointsResults are close to target or vary between batches. 1 PointNo validated optical data. |
| Touch Sensitivity and Surface Smoothness | 12% | The installed film should preserve normal capacitive-touch response, provide a smooth writing and swiping surface, and avoid visible orange-peel texture, bubbles, or optical distortion. | Samples installed on representative devices; touch-response test before and after installation; visual inspection under controlled lighting; friction or surface-smoothness data where available. | 5 PointsNo touch delay or visible surface defects in repeated trials. 3 PointsMinor variation requiring installation adjustment. 1 PointFrequent touch or surface defects. |
| Self-Healing Performance | 10% | The supplier should define the scratch type, load, temperature, recovery time, and pass/fail limit. A valid claim must distinguish superficial scratches from cuts that penetrate the protective layer. | Written test protocol, before-and-after photographs, controlled scratch testing, and time-lapse recovery results at defined temperatures. | 5 PointsRepeatable recovery under a documented test method. 3 PointsRecovery is demonstrated but test conditions are incomplete. 1 PointOnly promotional claims are provided. |
| Surface Hardness and Abrasion Resistance | 10% | Use the hardness value only together with flexibility and abrasion performance. If a pencil-hardness claim is made, require the test method and load; ASTM D3363 is commonly used for coated surfaces. | Pencil-hardness report where applicable, abrasion test results, coating thickness data, and samples inspected after repeated rubbing. | 5 PointsHardness and abrasion results meet the agreed product specification. 3 PointsAcceptable results with limited supporting data. 1 PointHardness is claimed without a method or report. |
| Adhesion and Edge-Lift Resistance | 12% | The adhesive should apply without persistent bubbles and remain attached at curved edges during the agreed service period. Peel strength must be evaluated on the actual substrate and after defined aging. | Peel-adhesion testing such as ASTM D3330 when appropriate, installation trials on glass and selected device surfaces, and heat-humidity aging results. | 5 PointsStable adhesion with no meaningful edge lift after aging. 3 PointsGood adhesion on flat surfaces but limited curved-edge data. 1 PointFrequent lifting, residue, or installation failure. |
| Flexibility and Dimensional Stability | 8% | The film should conform to the intended screen geometry without cracking, whitening, excessive shrinkage, or permanent deformation. Acceptance limits should be specified by film thickness and device curvature. | Bending and wrapping trials, dimensional-change data after heat exposure, and tensile or elongation testing such as ISO 527 where relevant to the film material. | 5 PointsMaintains appearance and fit after repeated bending and aging. 3 PointsSuitable for flat or mildly curved devices only. 1 PointVisible cracking, shrinkage, or poor conformity. |
| UV-Curing Compatibility | 8% | If the product uses a UV-curable adhesive or installation process, the supplier must state the required wavelength range, irradiance, exposure time, and curing conditions. The process should not damage the substrate or leave uncured residue. | UV-curing process specification, safety data sheet for the adhesive system, cure-validation records, and post-cure adhesion and optical tests. | 5 PointsComplete, repeatable curing process with validated results. 3 PointsProcess works but requires manual adjustment. 1 PointIncomplete curing or process information. |
| Environmental and Chemical Compliance | 8% | Materials should comply with applicable market requirements, including restricted-substance controls under RoHS and chemical obligations under REACH where applicable. Compliance must cover the supplied product and its components. | Current third-party RoHS test report, REACH declaration or SVHC statement, safety data sheet, material declaration, and product traceability records. | 5 PointsComplete, current documentation matches the shipped product. 3 PointsPartial documentation requiring follow-up. 1 PointNo verifiable compliance evidence. |
| Weathering and Temperature Resistance | 7% | The film should retain appearance, adhesion, flexibility, and optical performance across the agreed operating range. UV exposure, heat, humidity, and low-temperature tests should reflect the target market. | Accelerated weathering or UV-aging results using a defined method such as ISO 4892 where applicable, plus temperature-humidity cycling and low-temperature installation tests. | 5 PointsPerformance remains within agreed limits after aging. 3 PointsBasic aging data is available but incomplete. 1 PointNo environmental-resistance validation. |
| Quality Management and Batch Consistency | 5% | The supplier should use documented incoming-material inspection, in-process controls, final inspection, nonconformance handling, and lot traceability. A quality-management certification is useful but does not replace product testing. | Quality-management certificate where applicable, inspection plan, certificate of analysis, batch records, defect classification, and corrective-action procedure. | 5 PointsTraceable control system with stable sample-to-batch results. 3 PointsBasic controls exist but records are limited. 1 PointQuality depends mainly on final visual inspection. |
| Customization and Technical Support | 3% | The supplier should support film thickness, die-cut dimensions, camera and sensor openings, packaging, installation tools, and device-specific fit validation without changing the agreed performance specification. | Technical data sheet, drawing review, prototype samples, revision-control process, installation instructions, and response-time commitment for engineering issues. | 5 PointsFast engineering support with controlled revisions. 3 PointsCustomization is available with limited technical resources. 1 PointOnly standard products are supported. |
| Production Capacity and Delivery Reliability | 2% | Capacity should be evaluated against the required monthly volume, forecast variation, lead time, packaging requirements, and backup arrangements. Capacity claims should be supported by production records. | Capacity statement, recent delivery performance, production lead-time record, continuity plan, packaging specification, and agreed inspection-before-shipment process. | 5 PointsCapacity and delivery history match the purchasing plan. 3 PointsCapacity is adequate but has limited backup. 1 PointUnverified capacity or repeated delivery uncertainty. |