| Typical Brinell Hardness | Approximately 360–440 HBW | Approximately 410–490 HBW | Approximately 460–540 HBW | Approximately 500–600 HBW | Higher hardness generally improves resistance to sliding abrasion, but it can reduce formability and make fabrication more demanding. |
| Typical Minimum Yield Strength | About 1,000 MPa | About 1,100 MPa | About 1,250 MPa | Often 1,300 MPa or higher | Use yield strength when the plate must carry structural loads in addition to resisting wear. |
| Typical Tensile Strength | About 1,200 MPa or higher | About 1,300 MPa or higher | About 1,450 MPa or higher | Commonly above 1,600 MPa | Tensile strength indicates the approximate stress level at which the material begins to fail in tension; it is not a direct measure of wear life. |
| Relative Wear Resistance | Good | Very good | Excellent | Very high under suitable conditions | Choose the hardness level according to the abrasive material, impact energy, sliding speed, and required service life. |
| Impact Resistance | Generally the most forgiving option | Good balance of toughness and hardness | Good, but less tolerant of severe forming and impact than lower-hardness grades | More sensitive to severe impact, notching, and improper fabrication | For large rocks, dropped material, or shock loading, toughness and plate support may be more important than maximum hardness. |
| Cold Formability | Moderate to good with proper tooling | Moderate | Limited; requires larger bend radii | Very limited; forming may require special procedures | Confirm the manufacturer’s minimum inside bend radius before bending, rolling, or pressing the plate. |
| Weldability | Generally the easiest among these grades | Good with controlled heat input | Requires qualified welding procedures and hydrogen control | Requires strict preheating, interpass-temperature, consumable, and cooling control | Higher hardness usually increases the risk of hydrogen-assisted cracking in the heat-affected zone. |
| Typical Applications | Chutes, liners, hoppers, truck bodies, structural wear parts | Conveyor liners, screens, buckets, feeders, transfer points | Mining liners, crusher components, dump bodies, heavy-duty wear plates | Severe sliding-abrasion liners, high-wear screens, specialized mining equipment | Match the grade to the dominant wear mechanism rather than selecting the hardest plate automatically. |
| Best Suited Wear Mechanism | Mixed abrasion and impact | Moderate sliding abrasion with impact | Severe sliding or three-body abrasion | Very severe sliding abrasion with limited impact | Impact, gouging, sliding, and grinding can produce different results even at the same nominal hardness. |
| Relative Fabrication Cost | Usually lower | Moderate | Higher due to fabrication controls | Highest because of specialized processing requirements | Total cost should include cutting, drilling, bending, welding, downtime, and expected replacement frequency. |
| When to Choose This Grade | When balanced toughness, fabrication, and wear resistance are required | When wear resistance must increase without moving to a very hard grade | When long wear life is more important than easy forming | When abrasive wear is extreme and impact and fabrication requirements are limited | The optimum grade is the lowest hardness that provides the required service life and operating reliability. |