| Air-Cooled Reciprocating Chiller | Reciprocating compressors circulate refrigerant, while outdoor air removes heat through condenser coils. | Approximately 10–500 refrigeration tons, depending on configuration. | About 2.5–3.5; actual performance depends on leaving-water temperature, ambient temperature, and part load. | No condenser water or cooling tower is required; only chilled-water-loop water may be needed. | Compact, relatively simple, suitable for smaller loads, and generally easier to install than water-cooled systems. | Lower efficiency at high outdoor temperatures; more compressor vibration and noise than many rotary designs. | Small commercial buildings, process cooling, laboratories, and facilities without cooling-tower infrastructure. |
| Air-Cooled Scroll Chiller | Scroll compressors use orbiting scroll elements to compress refrigerant; condenser fans reject heat to ambient air. | Approximately 10–200 refrigeration tons per packaged unit or modular system. | About 2.8–3.6 at full load, with good performance at reduced load when compressors are staged. | No cooling-tower water; requires water only in the chilled-water distribution loop. | Quiet operation, fewer moving parts, modular capacity control, and relatively low routine maintenance. | Efficiency and capacity can decrease during hot weather; large installations may require multiple modules. | Offices, retail buildings, schools, healthcare facilities, and light industrial applications. |
| Air-Cooled Screw Chiller | Twin-screw or single-screw compressors continuously compress refrigerant; air-cooled condensers reject heat outdoors. | Approximately 100–700 refrigeration tons, with some systems outside this range. | About 2.8–3.8 at full load, subject to operating conditions and compressor control. | No condenser water or cooling tower; chilled-water-loop water is still required. | Handles relatively large loads, offers continuous capacity modulation, and avoids tower-water treatment. | Requires substantial outdoor space and may have higher sound levels and lower peak efficiency than water-cooled alternatives. | Medium-sized commercial buildings, manufacturing plants, warehouses, and process-cooling systems. |
| Water-Cooled Centrifugal Chiller | A centrifugal impeller compresses refrigerant vapor; condenser water transfers heat to a cooling tower or another heat-rejection system. | Commonly 300–2,000+ refrigeration tons for large central plants. | Approximately 5.0–7.0 at full load under favorable design conditions; integrated plant efficiency is lower after pumps and towers are included. | Requires condenser-water piping, cooling towers or equivalent heat rejection, makeup water, blowdown, and water treatment. | Very high capacity and efficiency, especially for large buildings with steady cooling demand. | Higher installation complexity, tower maintenance, water consumption, and sensitivity to low-load surge conditions if poorly selected. | District cooling, data centers, airports, universities, hospitals, and large commercial central plants. |
| Water-Cooled Screw Chiller | Twin-screw compressors compress refrigerant, while condenser water carries heat to a cooling tower or heat-rejection loop. | Approximately 100–1,500 refrigeration tons. | About 4.5–6.5 at full load, depending on refrigerant, temperatures, and controls. | Requires condenser-water circulation, cooling-tower water management, and routine treatment. | Robust operation, strong part-load control, and suitability for variable or process-related cooling loads. | More auxiliary equipment and maintenance than air-cooled systems; water use may be unacceptable in arid locations. | Industrial plants, large commercial facilities, and applications requiring dependable variable-capacity cooling. |
| Absorption Chiller | Uses heat from steam, hot water, direct combustion, or waste heat to drive an absorption refrigeration cycle instead of relying mainly on mechanical compression. | Approximately 100–1,500 refrigeration tons, depending on heat source and design. | Thermal COP is commonly about 0.6–0.8 for single-effect and approximately 1.0–1.4 for double-effect systems; electrical input is comparatively low. | Usually requires condenser water and cooling-tower operation; water treatment remains important. | Can use waste heat or combined heat and power, reduces electrical demand, and has few major moving parts. | Lower thermal efficiency, larger footprint, slower response, and dependence on a suitable, reliable heat source. | Industrial sites, cogeneration plants, campuses, and facilities with continuous waste heat or steam availability. |
| Evaporative-Cooled Chiller | Evaporation of water pre-cools condenser air, allowing refrigerant heat rejection at a lower condensing temperature than standard air cooling. | Commonly 50–500 refrigeration tons, varying by design and climate. | Approximately 3.5–5.0 at full load under suitable design conditions. | Uses water for evaporation and requires water treatment, but may use less water than a separate open cooling-tower arrangement. | Higher efficiency than conventional air cooling in dry climates while avoiding a fully separate condenser-water loop. | Performance varies with humidity; requires water management and is not ideal where water availability is severely limited. | Dry or moderately dry climates, commercial buildings, and industrial facilities seeking improved air-cooled efficiency. |